Thread: Suggestions, Updates, Requests

Originally Posted by Morph

--- it's not that hard to write a review for a tracker... taking the pictures, uploading them on ti's image host and writing the info should not take more than 30 minutes, give or take. Why don't you just try it, and see where it gets you...let others see that tracker the way you do, if you really like it that much.

I do like it very much, but I am not as computer savvy as you guys. 30 min for you = hours for me.



---------- Post added 03-14-2012 at 12:12 PM ---------- Previous post was 03-13-2012 at 03:07 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Morph

--- it's not that hard to write a review for a tracker... taking the pictures, uploading them on ti's image host and writing the info should not take more than 30 minutes, give or take. Why don't you just try it, and see where it gets you...let others see that tracker the way you do, if you really like it that much.

Since I do like this tracker so much I decided to try and review it.

Can I request a review for BitToxic. As I am a recruiter, I think it would be a little biased if I did the review.

Please also note the irc servers info. And the wiki. Are very much a part of the site, But dont require an invite.

Thank you

For an invite visit: BitToxic Recruitment

Originally Posted by smurfelina

I came a cross the scanbits review and noticed that it is old. A lot of things had changed since it was made. I can volunteer to make a new review but I don't know how to take those big screenshots for an whole web page. I can only take screenshots on what I am viewing at the moment. I'm working on a mac.

The program you looking for is " Skitch " [ Mac only]

For windows users you must have firefox and install "Screen Capture Elite " plugin

Originally Posted by le_us

How about adding more statistics to the reviews? For example: I heard SCC has a really big archive section, but is it bigger than the one at IPT? People say the pretimes are better but about how much? And how well seeded are old torrents?
In my opionion a selection of random releases could be picked and the pretimes and number of seeds (or even the speed) could be compared. This would make it possible to actually rate trackers precisely and would help people to know which tracker they need faster.

The problem is we don't have a baseline tracker to compare it to. We can only compare SCC to IPT what about other trackers. For example I compare CHDbit to HDChina and to pixel. Some people doesn't have an account on any of these trackers, it almost pointless to compare trackers.