[Music] What.cd (What) Review - Page 2
Register

We are the best invite forum on the internet! Here you will find free invites, free seedboxes, free bonuses, and much more. Our members know the true meaning of sharing and have created a truly global bittorent community! Our site has the most up to date information on all private trackers and our members will guide you and introduce you to this truly secretive and enlightened club. Ready to get started? Register now!


Page 2 of 31 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 12 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 306
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    213

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    What.cd is absolutely awesome if you are interested in music that is not mainstream. Waffles is a very good tracker, but for obscure releases in for instance the neofolk or apocalyptic folk genre, I haven't had much success with Waffles. What.cd has a lot more to offer in that regard. I am also very fond of there being much more options with regards to classifications when you upload an album to What compared to Waffles - the effect seems to be that people tend to be more careful with cataloguing their uploads. Moreover, in What, for instance, log files for your rips are automatically checked and you will know whether your rip is perfectly in accordance with the regulations or not.



    As for seeding, it's true that it takes some determination and thought to build ratio on What. I was a bit perplexed at first when I saw myself constantly being outseeded on a seedbox, despite quickly jumping on new, soon-to-be popular torrents. So I had to get myself a few strategies. Apart from the obvious, which is upload, I auto-download but put a lot of effort into making good filters (in accordance with my own tastes). It has worked really well so far; and combined with seeding everything I have downloaded, I now manage to upload about 1GB every 24 hours. Waffles in comparison, I never had to find a particular strategy, it's IMO much easier to have and maintain a good ratio (although I am a pretty new member of Waffles and was lucky to experience the freeleech - so maybe my views are a bit skewed).

    I also want to point out that What.cd's tutorial section of the forum has a wealth of information as well, from ripping to "pimping" your seedbox.
    Last edited by Malevich; September 5th, 2011 at 01:49 PM.


  2. To remove ads become VIP. Inquire about advertising here.
  3. #12

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    78

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    When were the last few times What has had Free Leech?

  4. #13

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,915

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by JMC08 View Post
    When were the last few times What has had Free Leech?
    I've only been a member for a few months, but I don't think they have a site-wide freeleechs very often. They had a "staff picks" freeleech about a month ago and I think they do neutral leeches from time to time.

  5. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    14

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    I just want to say that I love What.cd. They are hands down my favorite go to tracker for music.

  6. #15

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,915

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    Why is it so much harder to seed on What than on Waffles?

  7. #16

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    164

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by lastop41 View Post
    Why is it so much harder to seed on What than on Waffles?
    Because most of the people who use this tracker have seedboxes.

    On Waffles users are encouraged to use the tracker with small periods of side-wide freeleech and with really appreciated bonus points. Also u have hot categories/torrents. For example dubstep torrents and 0-day Waffles Official torrents are highly downloaded.

    On What you only have staff.picks which are rare and.. if you don't have same taste in music with the staff this are only good for ratio. A bad thing about these staff.picks is that are not perma freeleech. When a new round of staff.picks begins, the old staff.picks become un-freeleech. Anyway these staff.picks are better than nothing. Uploading is always a saving solution.

  8. #17

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Micronesia
    Posts
    652

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by lastop41 View Post
    Why is it so much harder to seed on What than on Waffles?
    I am not a member of What, just Waffles. In my opinion, the main reason it is so much harder to seed on What then it is Waffles, is that What is so much larger then Waffles, with regard to the number of torrents it has. Therefore, it makes it that much harder to find a CD that you own, that is not on What that you can rip and upload. On Waffles, becoming a PU is based on stats (regardless of whether you got them by actually ripping and upload content yourself), on What I believe, you have to literally upload 5 rips to become a PU, so that in itself is going to put some slight pressure on the userbase to add unique content. Also, Waffles seems to be a little more generous with with freeleech. So forcing the userbase to actually upload something to be PU and very rare Freeleeches undoubtedly results in a huge number of torrents added to the site and makes What the giant it is.

    When I was deciding which W to join back in february, the only reason I chose Waffles over What was because I knew What was so much larger then Waffles and therefore, it would be easier to find albums that I had that wasn't on Waffles and also, around that time What had a donation fiasco, which was a turn off.

    I just got my first Seedbox last week and I have been thinking about joining What because I am always asking my friends to look up albums on What for me because they are not on Waffles and most of the time they will be on What. I just don't feel like trying to play the "ratio" game at yet another tracker and What is "legendary" for being so difficult to seed.

    A dirty little secret is a lot of times, people that are members of both Ws will look for an album on both sites and if they find it on Waffles, they will download it there because it is so much easier to seed on Waffles lol.


  9. #18

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    164

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    Your dirty little secret is right. Also you're right that is very hard to find something to upload on What that not already exists. Scene music torrents are very fast uploaded too.

    Comparing What with Waffles, What as a really huge collection of music, in all formats and they are very organized (I love gazelle); But Waffles is much more accessible and I prefer Waffles over What because of that and because on Waffles @320 torrents are much more downloaded than V0 torrents, which is opposite on What.

    Anyway, in my opinion, both are must have trackers.
    Last edited by b2tb; September 18th, 2011 at 08:50 PM.

  10. #19

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,178
    Blogs
    1

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    What.cd and Waffles.fm are both great I prefere what.cd cause it's very organised.

  11. #20

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    US
    Posts
    160

    Default Re: What.cd | What | Music | 2011

    Quote Originally Posted by b2tb View Post
    Because most of the people who use this tracker have seedboxes.

    On Waffles users are encouraged to use the tracker with small periods of side-wide freeleech and with really appreciated bonus points. Also u have hot categories/torrents. For example dubstep torrents and 0-day Waffles Official torrents are highly downloaded.

    On What you only have staff.picks which are rare and.. if you don't have same taste in music with the staff this are only good for ratio. A bad thing about these staff.picks is that are not perma freeleech. When a new round of staff.picks begins, the old staff.picks become un-freeleech. Anyway these staff.picks are better than nothing. Uploading is always a saving solution.

    This information is mostly bullshit. Most people using what do NOT have a seedbox. It is hard to seed if you don't upload your own torrents because mainstream music gets snatched by a large amount of people of which some do have seedboxes and obscure music is snatched much less often. It is NOT impossible to keep a good ratio, however. I have 100 GB buffer without a seedbox, although it took time.

    Also, old staff picks are still freeleech when new staff picks come out, so that info is false as well.

    This is a tracker for people who love music and want to download and explore music they love, Not for torrent addicts looking to brag about a ratio and have the majority of their snatches be things they will never listen to.

    If you seed your torrents you will easily be able to get all of the music you could ever want, which in my opinion is the point of a music tracker.

    I absolutely love this tracker, I believe it is 10 times better than waffles for getting your music fix since it is highly organized and their related artists section on every artist's page is invaluable (Although I used waffles to get a bunch of big audio software torrents during their freeleech which was really nice and I couldn't have done that on what)

Page 2 of 31 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 12 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. [Old] What.cd (What) Review
    By Darius in forum Tracker Reviews
    Replies: 268
    Last Post: August 18th, 2011, 10:08 PM
  2. [Old] Speed.cd (SPD) Review
    By iloveflac in forum Tracker Reviews
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: June 21st, 2011, 03:10 PM
  3. [Old] Speed.CD (SpCD) Review
    By Maelstrom in forum Tracker Reviews
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: December 3rd, 2010, 11:37 AM
  4. [Old] What.cd (What) Review
    By Anthrax in forum Tracker Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 11th, 2010, 07:44 AM
  5. [Old] What (What) Review
    By GrapeSoda in forum Tracker Reviews
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: April 10th, 2010, 07:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •