Thread: Tracker Review Suggestion - Banned Trackers?

hello, i wanted to suggest that in the tracker reviews section, it would be really nice if a sticky thread be made where it be written that for which sites we cannot post a review . i posted recently iTS reviews. i did not knew that i wasn't allowed to reveal the name as i am a non-member. so it would be great at least to mention of which sites we are not to reveal names or even write a review on it. thankyou!

Hey, it's been suggested here: Request Tracker Review

already been suggested

thread closed

Hold on guys, the other thread was for a completely different idea. Besides duplicate suggestions are not necessarily a bad thing. All to often a good idea gets lost amongst thousands of other posts. An easy way to tell if a good idea is being ignored is by how often it gets suggested.

Yes, we need to create a list of trackers that should only be referred to by acronym. We also need a list of trackers that are not allowed to be reviewed. I'm going to add this to the Staff To Do List.

Thanks Poti.


P.S. iTS would not be on that list. Mustang's post in your review was his personal opinion, not a requirement of TI.

I agree with poti and Vegas. Maybe post it in the rules for Tracker Review.

here we go again...i posted coexist review with much enthusiasm..and what happens.. after a day or two..it gets deleted automatically..wow

Originally Posted by poti

here we go again...i posted coexist review with much enthusiasm..and what happens.. after a day or two..it gets deleted automatically..wow

Reason: not necessary a good review for 2010 already exists

We already have a perfectly good review in place, no need for dupes. Also please be patient as we group all the rules together.

Actually, I think this one was a mistake. Half of the images in the other 2010 review were broken and it lacked any type of written description. Poti's version is substantially better. His thread has been restored and the other review has been deleted.

Just to clarify, everyone is free to replace an existing review (even the same year). The only requirement is that the new review is better than the last. This creates a peer review system that rewards hard work instead of thread senority.

Sorry for the mix-up Poti.

One should make a list of those trackers in a post stick them in the review column to avoid any kind of confusion before making any review.