Low-level trackers are referred to as such because there is an abundant amount of invites available; thus, being fairly simple for a user to become a member. Mid-level and high-level works similarly - either being moderately difficult or extremely difficult to receive an invitation. Basically, it doesn't matter how awesome the tracker is; if there are numerous invitations floating about, it will be classified as low-level.



The whole trusted idea is completely up to the inviter to decide. Some members may value one tracker higher than another so they'll ask for more prerequisites before inviting someone. T-I's trusted section asks that no low-level invitations are to be placed there, but really, we've been seeing so many high-level tracker trickle down to the mid-level section that it could pretty much be classified as one which brings us back to igge's reason for posting the thread.

All we can really point out is T-I have done its job well. How? It's fairly easy to find invitations to trackers like SCC, GFT, BCG, TT, BitMeTV, BitMe and many, many more which is the intention. Yes, it's great for new members. Yes, we could pre-screen users. Yes, we could add prerequisites to our give-aways, but this obviously does not always work since traders and scammers could eventually 'scam' their way to the top. The system is flawed, but inviters are obviously expected to pay close attention and do a little bit of research before inviting anyone.

If it wasn't for T-I, I wouldn't have got into many of the trackers I'm a proud member of today.