Thread: Take BHDTV off of Trusted Invites

Hi,
Bit-HDTV is still under "Trusted" here:
http://www.torrent-invites.com/give-...here-post.html

But it is low level and is in the sticky in the low level section.

It's still a bit harder to seed as the content is usually in the multi-tens of gigabytes. The middle section is probably where it should be at - but if its in trusted almost no one will get it there (idk why, it just seems that way) so people looking to get rid of their invites always just post it low level.

I would have to say keep it where it is.
It is a tracker with good content, and good speeds, a lot of users, somewhat medium to seed, so I would suggest keeping it where it is.'
Medium level tracker.
Not trusted, just to clarify that.

I think invites should be defined by how many invites there are out there and how easy it is to get one. Using that criteria, everyone in the world seems to have BHDTV invites so I think they should be low-level. Just my 2 cents.

Originally Posted by an5555

I think invites should be defined by how many invites there are out there and how easy it is to get one. Using that criteria, everyone in the world seems to have BHDTV invites so I think they should be low-level. Just my 2 cents.

If trackers were based on your criteria on the ease of obtaining an invite then all trackers would be low level except FTN and a few others which have closed signups and invites. Since you can pretty much get any invite here as long as your trustworthy and are a good TI member.

Even if you have to pay to get invites, they woulds till be in the low category, if we look from your criteria. For example, SCC and SCT are both top trackers, which you have to pay for, SCT is 20 EU for an invite, and SCC is 10 EU, but as you can see, you can easly obtain those invites here from the trusted give away section and the VIP section if you have the qualification on getting in there. So, would you classify SCC and SCT as low level trackers?

Pony an means that if people post "Just ask" threads or 1 proof threads they should be low level (i think). Then harder ones for more trusted members and more ratio proofs in trusted, and in-between trackers go in the mid.

Hmmm, Sorry, I didn't realize that an was saying that. I kind of do agree with that. Then again people have different views on their trackers and how protective they want to be over it.

To be honest there is no real criteria to what tracker levels. Everyone has a different criteria really.

All in all I think bit-hdtv should be in the mid level section, but taken of the trusted section.

/pony

...........

Ok, let me reword... how many BHDTV invites are offered at this very moment on this site? How many SCC/ScT invites are offered on this site?

Your explanation of the ease in getting SCC/ScT invites has me a bit confused. At BHDTV, invites are very easy to obtain without having to shell out any money. SCC/ScT don't give out invites period unless you donate money. By your line of thinking, FTN would also be very easy as you only have to donate a certain amount and you will (most of the time) get an invite at the start of the next month when the staff approves the dispersal of invites (and yes, I am a member there).

So..... at BHDTV, you get invites given to you all the time (or can buy with bonus). At SCC/ScT/FTN, you have to donate money to get invites. Seems BHDTV is much easier to me. Anyway, the other part of what I posted said how many invites are out there (like how many invites are actually available at places like T-I). You can not tell me that SCC/ScT/FTN GA's are just as plentiful as BHDTV here can you?

I'm assuming that maybe your criteria would be the difficultness of maintaining a good ratio? I assume this because you qualified BHDTV as "medium to seed". By that line of thinking, PTN, GFT, FTN, and other ratioless trackers should be in the low-level. Also, the newest trackers should be in the highest level because the newest trackers continually are the toughest to seed due to not having enough leeches which is in turn due to not having enough members yet. The difficulty of maintaining a ratio should have absolutely nothing to do with where the invites are given (though it may impact the inviter's criteria on what is required to win the invite).

I did not mention this, but one last criteria in where a certain tracker should be located is the paranoia level of the tracker in question. For example, x264 may not be on the level of SCC/ScT/FTN in terms of difficulty of getting an invite or the amount of invites available, but since they are so strict, they should be located in the Trusted Section. (Note: This last part doesn't apply to BHDTV because they really don't care about T-I the way x264 or BCG does.)