Polls Sub-forum.

[Jschro14]

If you're anything like me, you love checking out all the polls people post, but at times, it can get somewhat hard to remember where they all are to go check on the updated results of the polls.

So, I suggest a polls sub-forum, which will be the only place where you're allowed to create a poll.

A one stop shop for knowing what everyone thinks about everything, from trackers to breakfast choices. :)



Interested to hear what others think, oh hey, here's a poll to decide.

[holmes]

Aye
I am with you

[Healium]

+1 for a poll section, we already have a lot of these on the site scattered everywhere. we could group them all into one place.

[adenai]

NO to sub-forum but YES to "show previous polls" feature accessed from the homepage.

[Chunky]

Im for it to, its kinda nice to go to one place and find it there. It also helps to show the results if you lose track of what happened.

[Jschro14]

NO to sub-forum but YES to "show previous polls" feature accessed from the homepage.

I can't imagine that I'm the only one who NEVER goes to the homepage.

I didn't even remember it existed until you said that. I just bookmark the forums and always stay here.

[adenai]

I didn't use to as well, but I've recently been there few times. :] It's good for checking your rep power since it's the only place it's displayed, lol.

[Healium]

I didn't use to as well, but I've recently been there few times. :] It's good for checking your rep power since it's the only place it's displayed, lol.

indeed it is. i also use it for the "new posts" button

[adenai]

I dare to say these are features used as seldom as "previous polls" would be if created, so it would fit there. Another reason to visit the homepage, hehe.

[Jschro14]

So what you're saying adenai is:

Let's take the good idea of organizing polls, change it into a bad idea then slap it into a location where nobody will go, so that it fits with other things that nobody looks at. Then calling it a good plan because it fits there now that we mutated it into a bad idea... instead of just doing it the intelligent way that it was initially proposed?

That doesn't even make sense, and not just because of how poorly I worded it.


I appreciate your input but that seems horribly backwards.