Demanding the moderators name in Ratio-Proofs - Page 2
Register

We are the best invite forum on the internet! Here you will find free invites, free seedboxes, free bonuses, and much more. Our members know the true meaning of sharing and have created a truly global bittorent community! Our site has the most up to date information on all private trackers and our members will guide you and introduce you to this truly secretive and enlightened club. Ready to get started? Register now!


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lost in the Torrent World!
    Posts
    676

    Default

    The solution here is profile links. If someone doesn't seem right or I don't know them very well I ask for profile links. That way I know its them (at least I hope).



  2. To remove ads become VIP. Inquire about advertising here.
  3. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scarecrowsv View Post
    Recently i came across many users introduction's ratio proof and wondered how easy it is for anyone to cheat by posting some others ratio on imageshack etc as their own.

    So i suggest that everyday a completely random word be selected and all the ratio proofs submitted on the site have that particular word.
    It is easy to cheat yes. But even if what you are suggesting was implemented it's still easy to cheat. With minimal knowledge of Photoshop or any other similar applications anyone could alter their numbers. It's not hard at all. Going to forge an example and will post it later (need to install Photoshop first :p) to see what I mean.

    So either we just need to trust people for a change, which imo would be nice even though the majority of mankind does not deserve it, or find another solution.

    The only thing that comes to my head, that would still be hard and timeconsuming in some cases but uncheatable, is for people to PM profile links as proofs instead of just posting a screenshot. Still I don't know if that is possible cause I'm not sure on whether you need to be a member on that paricular site already to see the link.
    Last edited by Mortivore; April 14th, 2009 at 09:49 PM.

  4. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    829

    Default

    I like this idea.

  5. #14

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
    I like this idea.
    if you like my idea gif rep!!!

    Now to come back to what I was saying b4.

    This is an actual screenshot of my ratio in pureTnA:

    Take a good look at it.

    Now check this out. Some fast editing in Photoshop. Could be better but couldn't be arsed to spend more time to prove my point:

    Hope people don't think I'm cheating now lol

    So anyone can cheat on screenshots even with all the random words in address bar you could think of. So either we just trust people or find another way.

    PS. There is a tit in those screenshots hope none gets offended. If you are underage I suggest getting permission from your mom before clicking :p
    Last edited by Mortivore; April 14th, 2009 at 10:33 PM.

  6. #15

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lugano, Switzerland
    Posts
    75

    Default

    Gpoh69 perfectly illustrated the point I was making before: if someone is really determined, any kind of ratio proof is not a problem at all to fake.

    To see a profile page on a tracker, you need to be a member.
    It's not exactly a problem, because on this forum there is a lot of people with accounts on almost all trackers.

    A "real" ratio proof would be as follows:


    1. I want an invite for XYTorrents, I am a member of ABTorrents.
    2. I ask for someone with an account on ABTorrents to check my profile page by sending him the link via PM here on Torrent Invites.
      This person must be well repped and iGiven because there's a security risk involved.
    3. After checking my profile page, that person sends me a PM on ABTorrents.
    4. I come back here, I post that PM, the person checking my proof confirms it's what was sent.
    5. When I ask for an XYTorrents invite, I link to that discussion for proof.

    No cheating is possible there, unless the two users agree to cheat.

    I believe we all agree that it would be a real mess to enforce.
    I still prefer trust :laugh:


    PS: no offense taken, I like b00bs

  7. #16

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertoM View Post

    I believe we all agree that it would be a real mess to enforce.
    I still prefer trust :laugh:


    PS: no offense taken, I like b00bs
    My point as well. It will be messy and time consuming. But I wouldn't mind if it has to be done.

    PS. EVERYONE THAT LIKES BOOBS REP ME AND I WILL PROVIDE MORE!!!

  8. #17

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    666

    Default

    well from the past few days i m observing that . many new comers dont even bother to read the introduction template .. adding another rule could mess up the intro section all along . its wot i think could happen if this rule is implicated .. but personally speaking i like ur idea but it is bit hard

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. A change in standard ratio proofs
    By MajorNil in forum Completed
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: January 5th, 2011, 04:50 AM
  2. Embedding Ratio Proofs/Speedtests in posts
    By peter330 in forum Internet
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 15th, 2010, 06:34 PM
  3. editting out tima stamp in ratio proofs
    By mvg in forum Suggestions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 9th, 2010, 07:05 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 17th, 2009, 09:49 AM
  5. ratio proof with GA thread in background
    By kachraa in forum Suggestions
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: November 6th, 2008, 03:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •