unified invitations page
Register

We are the best invite forum on the internet! Here you will find free invites, free seedboxes, free bonuses, and much more. Our members know the true meaning of sharing and have created a truly global bittorent community! Our site has the most up to date information on all private trackers and our members will guide you and introduce you to this truly secretive and enlightened club. Ready to get started? Register now!


Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree5Likes
  • 2 Post By Keyser_Soze
  • 2 Post By aap1
  • 1 Post By LexLuthor

Thread: unified invitations page

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Giza, EG
    Posts
    521

    Default unified invitations page

    hi,i have been noticing in area 51 Free Invites that user a is posting ipt invitation then user b is posting also ipt invitations and i thought of a solution to that so users do not read redundant titles .i purpose that we make a form where members post through their invitations and the system generate the topics organizedthen members who want invites visit page with links to each tracker name ex:ipt , tl ... etc sorted by name or availability thenselect say ipt a new page load and topics of inivtes appearwhen the invitation is sent and igiver is submited the invitations by the original inviters are subtracted by one automaticallyi just hope someone have the time to think of itthank you



  2. To remove ads become VIP. Inquire about advertising here.
  3. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Where you will never find me :]
    Posts
    1,453
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    This seems like an awful lot of hassle, i don't mind it the way it is. I for one do not like having too many threads for giveaways and doing it like this would make for lots of individual threads to constantly maintain. It would be too much hassle for me. Take a look at this giveaway. http://www.torrent-invites.com/10-gi...rt-3dt-al.html I would be all day sorting through that if every tracker had to have their own thread. Also every giveaway has its own rules and as for the redundant threads issue, it is up to the peep doing the giveaway to maintain and update the giveaway and also to close the giveaway when it is finished.
    PROXIE and LabChimp like this.

  4. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,351

    Default

    I have to disagree with this suggestion. This is way too much work for the moderate and too many sub-forums.
    10%, 33%, 55% with over 100's of different sub-forums. There's a lot of trackers out there.

    We had: [Movie & TV], [Porn], [Misc], [Ebook], [General]

    Trackers that falls under those catagories would be placed inside those sub-forums.

    And that didn't work out and we had to remove it.

    The chance of this suggestion being approve is very close to none.
    Last edited by Hearts; January 29th, 2012 at 06:07 AM.

  5. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Giza, EG
    Posts
    521

    Default

    no i had not meant that i meant that one time organization to the system and most of the work will be automated , the inviter will not care after inviting another member because the invite will be subtracted automatically from the system and after it reach zero the post will be deleted , i know it is alot of work at first but it may lead to less responsibilities afterwards and thanks for everyone for sharing their opinion

  6. #5
    shadowbuild is online now shadowbuild's Avatar THE DARKSIDE OF TI

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    in your subconscious
    Posts
    11,532
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    this here sounds like too much of a hassle to implement not only for staff but for our members as well at this point I would have to say no to this suggestion

    only the shadow knows the evil in the heart of men

  7. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    235

    Default

    Everyone has different requirements for their giveaways so i doubt this would be wise

    The current system might not be that organised but it only takes a little search to find exactly what you are looking for...It's a good idea but don't think benefits of this would justify the amount of work that would be needed to get this implemented when the current system is not that bad....

    Don't fix what isn't broken

  8. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Giza, EG
    Posts
    521

    Default

    I guess i understand now that this idea would be a disaster to implement and most probably would make more problems than the ones it solve , so i withdraw it and close the case
    Thanks for everyone who listened , who discussed and even watched the thread without interaction
    Keyser_Soze likes this.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •