Suggestion on giveaways. - Page 2
Register

We are the best invite forum on the internet! Here you will find free invites, free seedboxes, free bonuses, and much more. Our members know the true meaning of sharing and have created a truly global bittorent community! Our site has the most up to date information on all private trackers and our members will guide you and introduce you to this truly secretive and enlightened club. Ready to get started? Register now!


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 19 of 19
Like Tree30Likes

Thread: Suggestion on giveaways.

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Islа de Muerte
    Posts
    1,065

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesG
    they are your invites and you can ask for whatever requirements you like
    what else can be said



    Rules | FAQ | Helpful | Staff

    My giveaways:
    10% | 33% | 55% | Bonus

    Be smart, be a fox.


  2. To remove ads become VIP. Inquire about advertising here.
  3. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Could be anywhere.
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malevich View Post
    I like all ideas about taking measures to protect against cheaters/traders, but have to agree with it being up to each individual inviter.

    Just one question about the statistics proof of the seedbox; I have noticed that the statistics for, for instance Rutorrent resetting itself if the client freezes or when it's restarted. Will it require special plugins to be installed to be able to give accurate stat proofs?
    Seedbox proofs are not shown to show stats but just to prove that you have a seedbox. Stats are shown from your tracker proofs. Even the slowest seedboxes are very fast connections so just proving that you have one is usually enough.

  4. #13

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesG View Post
    Seedbox proofs are not shown to show stats but just to prove that you have a seedbox. Stats are shown from your tracker proofs. Even the slowest seedboxes are very fast connections so just proving that you have one is usually enough.
    Thank you for the reply! I also wonder if the proposed idea for seedbox or torrent software statistics matched against ratio proofs is a good extra measure against bad invitees. My rutorrent statistics seem to reset itself now and then which I think correlates with it freezing and when I manually have to restart it (not sure though).
    Last edited by Malevich; October 27th, 2011 at 10:43 AM.
    JamesG likes this.

  5. #14

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Paranoialand
    Posts
    1,534
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That's actually a pretty good suggestion from DravanDarkstar, but forcing some kind of requirement for all trackers is unnecessary.
    If we force this rule only for harder to get trackers it would just complicate things and a lot of newbies are already complaining how complicated things here are.

    I think every inviter should be able to choose the requirements they want: if they give away Pedro's in 10% it's their own choice, not that I think anybody will do that.

    When I give away some good invites in the future I will surely impliment this 'vouching for other people' rules, because it's a great idea, but forcing it for all giveaways is a bad one.

    When you look at the VIP section you will also see that the good invites only go to people that have a lot of reputation, posts and thanks and last but not least, just because a lot of people apply for your giveaway doesn't mean you have to give it to one of them if they are all bad.
    Last edited by Magister; October 27th, 2011 at 12:55 PM.
    Goldstone, JamesG and Schrodinger like this.

    If you need help feel free to PM me, but keep in mind that asking for an invite is not considered help.

  6. #15

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    My own subconscious.
    Posts
    1,790
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    So what if the guys that vouch for a member are unaware that the member is a bad apple? Even traders and cheaters get far in here if they are careful. Sure they will get caught sooner or later but some still slip through and make it far on here before being caught (need I mention CptLennox29? ) The ideal is fine if people wish to do this but enforcing us to do this would in my opinion cause a drop in invites being given away here, of course I don't see this being enforced now or in the future.

    It's the inviter responsibility (wow that is being said a lot lately lol) to research their potential invitees, so if they want people to "vouch" for a member then so be it, that is their right to do so as it's their accounts that are on the line.

    Quote Originally Posted by DravanDarkstar
    A lot of people come into T-I and buy ViP just to get FtN or some really exclusive tracker.
    Buying VIP doesn't mean you will get ftn or any other hard to get tracker.

  7. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Overall these requirements could be a very good move in the future for T-I, it has it written all over it. TI could become something of a privilege for invites than being despised and maybe sway trackers that do not respond well with these sorts of sites into actually respecting the methods that are already implemented here for the betterment of the community

    Good job man
    Schrodinger likes this.

  8. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,700

    Default

    Sites who hate us will continue to hate us no matter what we do, unless we eliminate the GA section altogether. Making a bunch of rules won't change anything, even in the far future.

    I for one make TG post my own words.
    Last edited by Fractal; October 27th, 2011 at 06:13 PM.
    Schrodinger likes this.
    Need some help in portuguese?
    Send me a PM

  9. #18

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fractal View Post
    Sites who hate us will continue to hate us no matter what we do, unless we eliminate the GA section altogether. Making a bunch of rules won't change anything, even in the far future.

    I for one make TG post my own words.
    That's true, Dravan's suggestion is understandable but should we manage and take care invites of our own? So if you think your invites are at risk or too much value to give away easily then just post it in 55% section or someway that you feel safe giving it away .

    I think this is a great site despite the bad reputation in the past. I've just been here a few days but I could see that the managers have a lot of passionate with the forum and closely monitoring it. I feel safe being around here. But take a look at the fact that most people come here to get invites, once they got what they wanted, they're gone. Take this topic as an example, a very good idea, but most of the replies are from Admin, Mod or senior member ... where is the new member? They should be here, because the discussion is for the very benefit of them... Maybe they just don't give much attention about this.

    Making rules won't change that, no matter how strict they are, in the end someone still slip through... Instead, make it a friendly community, where ppl could hang out and making buddy , where they could chit chat everything, not just give and take invites. Based on mutual trust and friendship, maybe someones gonna change their whole idea about TI.
    JamesG and Schrodinger like this.

  10. #19

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    55

    Default

    As a new member, I think there are adequate measures in place already to protect the inviter provided the appropriate measures are taken and due diligence carried out. Obviously every now and then there will be those that fall through the cracks, but no matter what system you put in place this is going to happen regardless. I think the suggestion in principle is a good one, but one in which it would be difficult to implement across the board for reasons mentioned previously.

    At the end of the day, it should be left to the person giving away the invite(s) in determining what safe-guard measures they have in place in order to select suitable invitees.
    Schrodinger likes this.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. I have a suggestion on the tutorial section
    By Rocco in forum Completed
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: July 5th, 2010, 12:34 PM
  2. My suggestion on GA section
    By Phonetic in forum Suggestions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 24th, 2009, 10:11 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 28th, 2009, 02:07 AM
  4. Any suggestions on how to scan book into ebooks
    By rootmaster in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 20th, 2009, 11:47 PM
  5. Replies: 55
    Last Post: December 30th, 2008, 04:16 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •