Thread: How to handle people who get disabled for inactivity

Originally Posted by BlackHeart

I don't get what you mean... No one said that inviters shall be forced to give negative igiver.
And damn fractal you just can't know what you get into when you request an invite..
Many users told me that i will strugle CHDBits so i got the invite from one friend. And right now im doing it just fine on that so "Hard-to-seed" CHDbits.
My point You can't relay on others opinions about one tracker or another...

Read my posts carefully and you will see that i'm saying quite the oposite, the same way you can't stop anyone from leaving a bad igiver to a disabled invitee, i can't make anyone submit it either.
I said that you knowing or not knowing is your problem, most of the users hand invites out expecting you use it and it is your responsability to meet his expectations, or don't ask for the invite.

Originally Posted by Arakasi

You are absolutely right, but I am lazy. I probably do not screen my invitees well enough, but 'touch wood', I have not had any serious problems, never been banned, and only lost invite privileges on 1 tracker, but in the same vein if I see a negative iGiver I will not invite that person. You can look at my history, I have given out plenty of invites, but I am telling you I will never invite an individual with a negative iGiver. I won't take the effort to examine why they have it, I will just see that, and decide it is not worth the risk.

So until you don't see the risk, you don't give a fck about it? hmmm

edit: well from the way you said it looks that way :S

hmm let me rephrase myself. For you, user with a negative iGiver is bad user? So logically the opposite if a user have no negative iGiver he is good user...

Originally Posted by BlackHeart

So with not seeing the risk you don't give a fck about it? hmm strange opinion

Thank you for your detailed analysis of my comments. Clearly I am someone that just does not give a fuck. For a moment I thought I did, but thanks to your expert breakdown of my inner psyche, I am reminded, that I absolutely do not.

In all seriousness I would probably liken myself to Arakasi as in i wouldn't most likely bother with any one who ahs a negative iGiver, not that I hand out invites all to often theses days mind you. However I would at least check into the reasoning provided the user has at least proven to be a good member here with post counts, and some positive iGivers.

If I was willing to invite someone who has a negative iGiver I can guarantee that he/she would be watched carefully and they will be made well aware of the fact that I will not tolerate a similar situation in which I would have to leave a negative iGiver. On the plus side for those in this situation I would then make it a point to offer them a positive iGiver after X amount of time has past and they have proven to be a wise choice in invitees.

I think if others were to do this the negative iGiver (even though it will always be there) would eventually be no big deal for this person. I mean anyone can redeem themselves in this community if they work hard to do so. Granted they may never be trusted again by the one who left the negative iGiver but oh well it's not like that person is the only inviter on here.