I can assure you that I have not made any rash opinions based soley on one source, I have researched this for a while now. Whilst I have not nor do I intend to examine the raw data my self. The reluctance of the scientific community to release their data suggests they have something to hide (I am referring to the leaked emails here). You can find the computer code that these models were built on and see for your self what they did here .
The fact still remains that there is a no statistically proved link between CO2 and climate change, makes a mockery of the man made propaganda. And that is the major focus of this agenda and their policy decisions. There is noway to seriously prove what is causing it, you can only be agnostic on this issue. And I'm lost now whether we're in agreement on this or not.
The banks are looking to make a killing on carbon trading. The same woman that invented Credit Default Swaps, Blythe Master, is now heading JPM's carbon trading efforts she says
The UN's climate change conference in Cancun finished recently much the same as Kyoto, non binding. What it did step up is that the parties decided to establish a Green Climate Fund under the authority of the Conference of the Parties. Requiring USD 100 billion per year by 2020. IMO this seem to be the first step towards creating a global tax."banks must be allowed to lead the way if a mandatory carbon-trading system is going to help save the planet at the lowest possible cost. And derivatives related to carbon must be part of the mix"
On the oil thing, I'm sure the drilling, refining and transportation process of getting the Oil produces CO2 somewhere along the line. Is this wrong?
To sum up, I looking to talk about who benefits, and possible agendas behind all of this, given that man made climate change is a lie knowingly put forward. It seems to be more about the money, and slowing the growth of developing countries than anything else. But everyone is welcome to their own opinion.