Thread: Was 9/11 An Inside Job?

NO way.....This can't be true.

The way in which the investigation was done seems there was a govt. role to some extent mayb not to the extent of conspiring but to willfully let it unfold unabated to create the required amount of hysteria among the people sufficient enough to fund the attack on IRAQ/AFGANISTAN

Offcourse it's an inside job because without such rage causing event the public wouldn't support 2 wars in which you now can't see no end.

I found this interesting:

Abnormal Stock Trading

In the week prior to 9/11, an “extraordinary” amount of put options were placed on United Airlines and American Airlines stocks. If you are unfamiliar with the stock market, a put option is financial contract between two parties that will offer the buyer insurance against a company’s excessive loss. Someone who purchases a put option is expecting a stock to drop or they are protecting their assets. Between September 6 and 7, 4,744 put options were purchased on United Airlines stock, compared to 396 call options. On September 10, 4,516 put options were purchased on American Airlines, as compared to 748 call options. The trading activity was 600% above the normal level. United and American Airlines were the only two companies who had planes hijacked on 9/11. There were also an abnormal number of put options purchased in companies who had a stake in the World Trade Centers.

The majority of the suspicious trading was linked to Deutsche Bank Alex Brown. On September 12, 2001, the head of the bank, Mayo A. Shattuck III, resigned from office. The previous director of the bank was A. B. Krongard, who is the former head of the CIA. Citigroup Inc and Morgan Stanley also received an abnormal number of put options, and both companies held offices in the World Trade Centers, and saw a decrease in stock price after the attacks. On September 10, 2001, Raytheon, a defense contractor, had an anomalously high number of call options traded. The Securities and Exchange Commission launched an insider trading investigation, in which Osama Bin Laden was a suspect, but no action was taken. The trading was traced to areas all over the world, with most activity occurring in the UK, Italy, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, France and the US.

In the days prior to 9/11, the Chicago Exchange saw the highest number of United and American Airlines options traded in history. The names of the investors remain a mystery, because they never claimed their money. After it was discovered that a single U.S.-based institutional investor, with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda, purchased a large amount of these options, the 9/11 Commission dismissed the importance of the events. Unfortunately, the abnormal trading did not tip off law enforcement, as intelligence agencies constantly monitor the stock exchange and the sudden rise in activity could have allowed analysts to “connect the dots” and see that a major event was about to take place involving American Airlines, United Airlines and The World Trade Centers. However, nobody could have imagined the scale of the tragedy.

Source: 10 Events Surrounding September 11

Ok,

AONL when he says "they made the decision to pull," he is talking about the firemen making the decision to pull out of the building because they don't think they can contain the fire anymore. Not "pull" as in blow it up.

The time of the fall of the towers makes sense when you take into account that the terminal velocity of a steel beam is much much higher than that of a human body which they use for their calculations in the link you supplied. Density is proportional to free fall velocity.

The ability of the hijackers to pilot the planes really does not factor into whether or not it is a conspiracy but I'll give it a go anyways. Just because the final maneuvers were expertly done does not mean a computer did it. It could mean the pilot had practiced before on a really plane or on a simulator. You do not have to have a computer to make almost perfect maneuvers. Pilots do it everyday. There are many different types of commercial aircraft. Just because it happens to have a dark spot on the bottom of the pictures does not mean that it is immediately military. IT could have been part of the original design of that aircraft or repairs that had been added on. Have you also thought of the fact that it could be the landing gear descending?

Sounds of explosions? Those are not explosions they are the sounds of rubble and material shifting as it settles into place as it falls. When you are dealing with that much material and that much weight it is going to be loud. Also New York is a place with a lot of walls for sound to bounce off of which can seem to make it louder than it actually is.

------------------------Post auto merged------------------------

Even when you look at whatever you are basing your opinion on you can only look at the cold hard facts of the case. If some scientists say something that does not automatically make them right. They might be a crazy person brough on to say they are some super special scientist but are making stuff up on the spot.

Originally Posted by Hobit103

Ok,

AONL when he says "they made the decision to pull," he is talking about the firemen making the decision to pull out of the building because they don't think they can contain the fire anymore. Not "pull" as in blow it up.

The time of the fall of the towers makes sense when you take into account that the terminal velocity of a steel beam is much much higher than that of a human body which they use for their calculations in the link you supplied. Density is proportional to free fall velocity.

The ability of the hijackers to pilot the planes really does not factor into whether or not it is a conspiracy but I'll give it a go anyways. Just because the final maneuvers were expertly done does not mean a computer did it. It could mean the pilot had practiced before on a really plane or on a simulator. You do not have to have a computer to make almost perfect maneuvers. Pilots do it everyday. There are many different types of commercial aircraft. Just because it happens to have a dark spot on the bottom of the pictures does not mean that it is immediately military. IT could have been part of the original design of that aircraft or repairs that had been added on. Have you also thought of the fact that it could be the landing gear descending?

Sounds of explosions? Those are not explosions they are the sounds of rubble and material shifting as it settles into place as it falls. When you are dealing with that much material and that much weight it is going to be loud. Also New York is a place with a lot of walls for sound to bounce off of which can seem to make it louder than it actually is.

------------------------Post auto merged------------------------

Even when you look at whatever you are basing your opinion on you can only look at the cold hard facts of the case. If some scientists say something that does not automatically make them right. They might be a crazy person brough on to say they are some super special scientist but are making stuff up on the spot.

Explain the nano-thermite for me please. I would love to think it was all just some crazy theory.

I don't want to believe that USA would leave their own people to die without trying to save them...

Some things you just have to face up to.

I have seen a documentary where was said that 9/11 really was an "insider's job".