Ron Paul - Page 4
Register

We are the best invite forum on the internet! Here you will find free invites, free seedboxes, free bonuses, and much more. Our members know the true meaning of sharing and have created a truly global bittorent community! Our site has the most up to date information on all private trackers and our members will guide you and introduce you to this truly secretive and enlightened club. Ready to get started? Register now!


Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44
Like Tree34Likes

Thread: Ron Paul

  1. #31

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Down the Pigeon Hole
    Posts
    190

    Default

    It's a bit disheartening for me to see some of the posts re. Ron Paul HERE in this forum. I guess I had the idea that the people that would be in this forum were more informed and would not buy into the mindless corporate-military-pharma-hollywood BS line that is spun in the mainstream media.

    "Ron Paul is looney"
    "Ron Paul can't win"
    Blah Blah Blah....
    Regurgitation...
    Defeatism...
    Corporatism...
    Fascism....
    All we are saying is give BS a chance....



    I can't believe that someone would say "too much liberty". Really? There's something like "too much liberty?"

    If you think Ron Paul is looney tunes then for sure we are in deep doo doo and you really need to look at the big picture.


    Side note: Your votes don't really count unless it's a landslide. Iowa was a joke and had a few too many anomalies. Votes were so tabulated/stolen there. Check out the Queen of Black Box Voting - Bev Harris - Black Box Voting - America's Elections Watchdog Group
    Last edited by alstele; January 7th, 2012 at 08:47 AM. Reason: had to add a John Lennon Reference...
    Confucius, LabChimp and lococo like this.


  2. To remove ads become VIP. Inquire about advertising here.
  3. #32

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    24

    Default

    I hope for the sake of hummanity Ron Paul wins.
    In defense of those silly attacks against Doctor Ron Paul:
    LabChimp, lococo, ops and 1 others like this.

  4. #33

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lococo View Post
    I know that in the Brain Stew section we're supposed to write elaborate thoughts and opinions, however, my question is very straightforward yet very complex.

    Do you support Ron Paul?

    Which of his view attract or repulse you, and why?
    i'm sorry, i would rather give the responsibility of America to Ron White and his awesome memory skills than to Ron Paul.

    I would also not confuse him with RuPaul.

  5. #34

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Hell Yeah, Know Yo Role BLVD
    Posts
    43

    Default

    On paper, Ron Paul has a lot of good things going for him. But one must be a fool to think that the "important people" is going to let this one man out-turn the whole establishment. What ppl fail to realize, our problems are technical not political; politics are not the answer to our problems. If anything, trusting the politic route has not ultimately been promising since its inception-- think about it.
    Last edited by SprSaiyan3; February 3rd, 2012 at 01:13 PM.
    alstele likes this.

  6. #35

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    かかか
    Posts
    902

    Default



    And a second one by the same artist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRxMQhn0WAg
    Last edited by LabChimp; February 4th, 2012 at 06:32 AM.
    AtomicDew likes this.

  7. #36

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    12

    Default

    People tend to say that Ron Paul has no chance of winning, plainly and simply, because they are just too dumb to know real change and liberty when it is right in front of them. I for one have read George Washington's Farewell Address, and I am paraphrasing here when I say that he told our people to keep to a path of non-intervention. That included staying out of any foreign matters whatsoever. In fact, I would say take a look at Switzerland, since they are landlocked in the craziest part of the world (European Dis-Union). Even though they are actually a part of that megalomaniacal organization, the Swiss prove that the ideals of non-intervention actually work very well, although it is true that they have not avoided alliances as Washington warned.

    Also, when Paul talks about eliminating the corruption-laden bureaucracies (all the "Departments" that we have), his alternative is to have state and local governments, and the communities in which people live, be the institutions which provide services. You can surely understand that some liberal, progressive slave-of-the-state in D.C. cares nothing for us, right? If you do not comprehend that, then I am sorry for you, please go and educate yourself in common sense. The politicians we have now just want to fill their coffers. Actually, starting in the 1920s and 1930s, when the Federal government was consolidating power, America began it descent into the Rome syndrome where the concept of "Empire" became the focus instead of real governance.
    lococo and alstele like this.

  8. #37

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    CA/NM, USA
    Posts
    11

    Default

    I think this thread needed a bump, considering that everyone but Romney and Paul is left in the race. People need to understand that it's a delegate race.

    Warren G. Harding - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Warren G. Harding walked into the Republican convention with the least amount of delegates and walked out with the nomination and soon after became the 29th president of the United States.



    Ron Paul vs Paul Krugman on the economy.

  9. #38

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Near Fort Knox, KY
    Posts
    86
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prettykitty View Post
    I agree with you on drugs, but I'd make the case that wiretapping and welfare have improved our society. It's all subjective though.
    Wiretapping and welfare have improved our society? Hardly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Himanlickman View Post
    Yeah, everyone bitches about him cutting programs, not understanding that America is over 2 trillion dollars in debt. You could throw armfuls of hundred dollar bills out of your window as a fulltime job for the rest of your life and never reach that amount of debt.
    U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time



    Quote Originally Posted by prettykitty View Post
    Because not everybody believes that our country would be in better shape by eliminating the department of defense, education, commerce, health and human services, and homeland security.

    In addition, I have been fortunate to enough to speak to a handful of economists regarding Ron Paul's view on the Fed, and they all said that Paul is completely off base. Paul maintains that our higher price level today has whittled the share of income accruing to labor, but there is no statistical evidence to back these claims.



    ---------- Post added at 03:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:35 AM ----------


    The politicians in Congress and the White House are by far the most competent and capable of running our nation. The average American likes to believe they could do a better job, but the reality is they have little understanding of political institutions.

    As for "the American Dream", well, I'd argue that statistics show that no such thing has ever truly existed.



    No where has Dr. Paul said or other wise eluded that he would or wanted to "eliminate" the DoD.

    However Dr. Paul has openly stated he would restructure the DoD and do away with needless programs, such as the RAH-66 Comanche, XM8 Modular Weapons Platform and M8 "Buford" Armored Gun System...all of which produced absolutely nothing, except billions of wasted tax dollars.



    Department of Defense Expenditure Breakdown for 2012:

    DOD spending: $707.5 billion
    FBI counter-terrorism: $2.7 billion .
    International Affairs: $5.6–$63.0 billion
    Energy Department, defense-related: $21.8 billion
    Veterans Affairs:$70.0 billion
    Homeland Security: $46.9 billion
    NASA, satellites: $3.5–$8.7 billion (Between 20% and 50% of NASA's total budget)
    Veterans pensions: $54.6 billion
    Other defense-related mandatory spending: $8.2 billion
    Interest on debt incurred in past wars: $109.1–$431.5 billion

    Total Spending: $1.030–$1.415 trillion

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milita...kdown_for_2012



    Department of Education Budget for FY2012: $77,400,391,000

    The Department of Education budget has risen every year. The highest educational budget of any developed nation, yet the US places 17th in the entire world.

    The "No Child Left Behind Act" was passed because of the massive public concern for lack of basic skills among youth.

    The Education Department is failing, has been failing and will continue to fail at it's sole purpose.

    I'm not even going to go into Student Loan Debt and the growing number of unemployed college graduates, but I will touch on the Education Department procurement of twenty-seven 870 Remington 12ga. Shotguns.

    FY2012 Education Budget

    http://m.whitehouse.gov/sites/defaul.../education.pdf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educat..._United_States

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind

    https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...3d1c3dee0039b2





    Department of Commerce Budget for FY2012: $14.0 Billion

    -The mission of the department is to "promote job creation and improved living standards for all Americans by creating an infrastructure that promotes economic growth, technological competitiveness, and sustainable development".



    March 2012 unemployment rate according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: 8.2% (12.7 Million)

    Of course the US government only counts people who are currently on Unemployment Benefits, but neglects to count those who have expired their benefits or elected not to use them.

    Do we even need to address the multitude of departments within the Commencement Department that preform the same duties as other departments, agencies, ect... not only with in the Commerce, but other departments and agencies.

    It seems the majority of the Department of Commerce is failing at it's "mission".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...nt_of_Commerce

    http://m.whitehouse.gov/sites/defaul...s/commerce.pdf

    United States Unemployment Rate

    Commerce Department 2012 Budget Cuts Spending, Invests in Priorities to Help America Win the Future | Department of Commerce




    Department of Health and Human Services Budget for FY2012: $79.2 Billion


    I don't even want to go into this, it is the boondoggle of all boondoggles.

    US obesity is at 52%, HALF of the US is obese.

    The leading cause of death in the US is Heart Disease.

    FDA is on a rampage against the Amish, organic foods and home gardens.

    Do you have any idea how many agencies and department other than the CDC study or preform disease control and prevention?

    H1N1, Obesity Epidemic, food scares, contaminated foods, ect... how in the world does the HHS even manage to justify it's existence to Congress.

    Federal Budget 2012 | The Washington Post

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesit..._United_States



    Department of Homeland Security Budget of FY2012: $55.1 Billion

    -In the United States, the concept of "Homeland Security" extends and recombines responsibilities of government agencies and entities. According to Homeland security research, the U.S. federal Homeland Security and Homeland Defense includes 187 federal agencies and departments,[2] including the United States National Guard, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the United States Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, the United States Secret Service, the Transportation Security Administration, the 14 agencies that constitute the U.S. intelligence community and Civil Air Patrol.

    Every agencies within DHS existed prior to it's existence. Yet for some odd reason we had to create a department to put them all into, because they weren't doing a horrible enough job within their separate parent departments already.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection
    United States Citizenship and Immigration Services


    Because one would not suffice, so we have THREE agencies that deal with customs, immigration and border protection. I mean, the 13.5 MILLION illegal aliens in this country, the unsecured borders... they're not any indication that they completely fail at their purpose as government agencies.

    Transportation Security Administration, I'd post some things on this, but the sheer amount of news articles and personal blogs surrounding not only the blatant violations of the 4th Amendment by the TSA, but the sexual harassment and abuse would surely crash T-I.

    Coast Guard, probably the most useful and justifiable within DHS...but what in the heck was the purpose of moving the Coast Guard for the DoD, to the DoT and then to DHS. Looks like somebody needed to rearrange so departments to justify the existence of another.

    Secret Service, because the Treasury Department wasn't doing just fine as the parent department. Prostitutes not included.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency, I'm not even going to comment on this.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homela..._United_States

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...eland_Security





    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH...9udUu5qkVX_2iQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gKX...ure=plpp_video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1n1X0Oqdw




    Most competent and capable...

    Fraud, lies, profiteering, racketeering, warmongering, corporatist, industry moguls...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIraCchPDhk

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PkW...eature=related



    Looks like Dr. Paul isn't so "loony".
    LabChimp likes this.

  10. #39

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    40

    Default

    I respect him for standing up to Republicans who aren't true Republicans

    I do not respect many of his ideas such as dumping so many parts of the Government which come off as "cool" to everyone but in reality would be disastrous for the many in this country who use these parts of the Government. And no, I don't mean dependent programs but regular programs.
    s2cuts likes this.

  11. #40

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    258

    Default

    I actually went out onto the streets in 2008 and held signs for Ron Paul. Argued his views, went to rallys, the whole bit. Me and my wife wrote in his name on the voting form for the main election, and registered as republicans for the first time to vote for him in the primaries.

    Since then however, I have done quite a bit of schooling. Taken a handful of history and politics college courses. While I like how consistent he is with his voting practices, and I consider him one of the least hypocritical politicians out there, my ideals just don't align with his anymore.

    Probably the biggest point of contention for me is in his platform is his view on free trade. I believe unrestricted capitalism to be fundamentally flawed.

    Another problem I have is with his more isolationist views on foreign policy. I may not like that we have military bases in a good most of other countries, and we meddle in their affairs a lot, but it doesn't mean I think we have a better option that will not have dire consequences.

    I do however think he is a good republican. Just what the republican party needs. I just don't have any plans to vote as a republican again anytime soon.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Paul Newman passes.
    By drfunke in forum Movies & TV
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: March 12th, 2009, 11:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •