Thread: The Myth of Free Private Trackers: A Commentary on the Economics of Private Trackers

Private trackers are seen widely across the bittorrent scene as a means to a "free" end. At its most basic level, we need to start with: "Why do you join a private tracker?" The answer is to get all kinds of free content shared by the members of the private tracker community which you have joined. Yet, are private trackers really free? What are the economics behind private trackers? What allows private trackers to maintain their speeds and permits them to rapidly upload content at such a blazing rate? All these questions might to the un-trained eye be answered simply by saying that private trackers are able to do what they do simply by their members all having the same goals when it comes to sharing. I disagree, and as you will see, there is an entire micro-economy within the torrent world.

There are established strata of factors which contribute to how successful a private tracker is perceived as. What makes a tracker: sugar, spice, and content, speeds, and the ever notorious pre-times.

Content is the range of material the private tracker allocates and distributes to its members. The sheer amount of TV shows at a television tracker, (BMTV, Freshon, TVT, etc.) or movies at a movie tracker, or games at a game tracker; all these contribute to a tracker’s worth. As well the speed the torrents are hosted at (ie how fast they can be downloaded or leeched at) also contribute to the worth torrenters see in the tracker. Finally, the faster files are released on the tracker compared to the same releases at other trackers (ie pretimes), give an additional level of value to trackers.

We know how trackers are valued, but what does it take for a tracker to compete for these categories of interest with other trackers. The answer is simply money: the dough, the moolah, that cash-money, that is what makes a good tracker. What? How is it possible that what makes a tracker good comes only from its pecuniary intake? The answer is simple, nothing is free.

Let’s look again at the factors we discussed before, but this time let’s look at them from the monetary perspective. How does a tracker win in the category of content? Simple, the tracker has to promote uploaders uploading more than downloading. How does a tracker win speeds? It makes sure that torrents are uploaded from fast internet connections, and it makes sure that the everyday member has to seed from a fast connection of their own. Finally, how does a tracker make sure its’ members are uploading files before other trackers; it makes sure their sources are better than the other trackers sources.

How does a tracker make sure that it accomplishes the above-stated goals, the answer is they follow three simple natural, yet always effective rules.

• 1. Ratio=Speed
• 2. Members=Content
• 3. Money=Pre-times

Let’s go through these, how does ratio=speed? If a tracker makes it harder to maintain a ratio on their site, by either artificially changing how seeding is counted by the tracker, or by paying for all content to be uploaded by ultra-fast connections which take away the chance of the everyday member to help upload to new leechers than they force their members to do something to compete. How does a member get their ratio higher if it is beyond their average means of their standard isp? A seedbox of course! Force your members to use a seedbox, and now all torrents are hosted at incredible speeds, since even the average user can upload as fast as physically possible. Why does SCC have such fast torrents, all you have to do is look in the peer list of your torrent. When half of the peers are uploading from a hosting data center, and the original uploader is on an ultra-fast connection, we now know what that translates into: a forced migration to paid seedbox hosting resulting in the tracker attaining high speed torrents.



How does What or Waffles get so many torrents uploaded? The easy answer is that they allow more members into their trackers than most other sites. Why? Easy, the more members, the more access to content they have and the more torrents which are uploaded. What does that result in, more donations to the tracker, and there for the tracker can invest more in advancing its factors of competition. Yet, how does a tracker with less members get a comparable amount of content to a tracker with more members?

The answer is that smaller trackers can achieve similar results to bigger trackers by paying "the scene" to do their uploading dirty work for them. You don’t have enough members to upload, get all of your content uploaded from a high speed box connected to a FTP at the top of the piracy pyramid. The more you pay for your FTP provider of releases, the faster your pre-times, the more content you get, the better your tracker gets.

So the more the tracker puts in, the more it gets out of its members and inversely the more it can give to its members. Yet, seedbox sales do not go to a tracker, and scene access also does not go to a tracker’s PayPal account. How does a tracker get money? Simple, the tracker makes its members donate by exploiting their artificial micro-economy.

If you look at the tracker market, the better the tracker, the harder it is to maintain a good ratio. What if the seedbox is not enough to keep your ratio up to par? Easy, the tracker has upload for a price, your donations. I want in to this awesome tracker with awesome pre-times. Okay, well someone is going to have to donate to get you an invite. How does the tracker get donations, it bets on its own intrinsic value. The better it becomes, the more it costs you in donations and in seedbox costs, and in your time.

So what does this all mean; it means that there is a reason why you were banned. It is not because your ratio was bad, it is not because you cheated or traded your account. You were banned because you could not afford to buy what trackers actually are, a market for a service. I don’t know about you, but it seems pretty hypocritical for anyone of us in this system to criticize content providers for charging for their content. We are paying for their content with bittorrent, just secretly.

Pretty Interesting & true in some cases imo
Source: The Myth of Free Private Trackers: A Commentary on the Economics of Private Trackers | THE source for BitTorrent & P2P Tips, Tricks and Info. | FileShareFreak

wow that was a long article, but i'm bored and actually read it all haha

i gotta agree with the whole "cost" issue. time is money and i have to spent a lot of time getting my ratio up on waffles! so far the only way i got my ratio over 1 was to wait for scene releases, download them from usenet, and then start seeding them right away so i could get some upload without using any download.

even then, it would upload a small amount then there would be so many other people seeding it wouldn't be worth anything. and that still takes several minutes per torrent. even with 25 torrents seeding on a gigabit connection i've still only gotten 1gb upload in 2 days (compared to over 100gb uploaded in less then 24 hours on revoTT).

seems like the best, and only sure-fire way to get lots of upload on waffles is to upload your own releases/CDs/etc, which takes even more time and effort.

on the other hand, why shoudlnt you have to put in a little effort? if no one cared/tried/seeded, these communities and trackers wouldnt be what they are.

all in all, i think it's a good system and if donating a little helps keep my favorite trackers alive, i'm all for it.

I didn't like what this article had to say. Maybe because it's true? yeah right... Just how exactly am I secretly paying for a tracker's content with bittorrent again? I've never felt any obligation to donate to a tracker, not saying I wouldn't. Click the link to the filesharefreak article and read the comments for a laugh.

Wow. What an incredibly misleading and inaccurate article.

As far as I can tell, this only really applies to a couple of trackers that I know of that do sell upload and invites, since that seems to be one of his main beefs. As for site owned seedboxes and bots, most trackers have come up with ways for users to keep up , FL and BPs.

Replace "Private Trackers" with "TorrentLeech" and I wouldn't have a problem with most of the article as that seems to be the article's true target here. Since, the bulk of his conclusion seems to focus on 0day trackers that sell upload and invites (I only know of TL that does this, but I'm sure there are others).

Also, if anything that he stated in the article were true, that the more money a site has, the better it is, then TL would, in fact, be the best 0day site in existence. But, this is not the case. Speeds and pre-times have always been better at sites like SCC and ScT. Also, by limiting their content, they are also behind other 0day's that do track porn.

The conclusion seems to state that private trackers depend on users, either through site activity or donations, to keep the tracker going and growing, which is common sense. But, the article itself seemed to lead to another conclusion which paints all trackers as greedy, money-hungry entities that use their ratio systems and status to reign in donations.

No offense to sTuDD, as he does a great job at bringing BT news to T-I, but that was a terrible article.

Without reiterating what has already been said, the cost has of Bittorrent has never been a secret to anyone. These articles are the exact reason why I never read sites like FSF, totally misleading and poorly written.

Donations are there to keep these sites up and running, server cost are not cheap and unless you bootleg your internet and stick to public sites, you better be prepared to spend some money.

I don't think there's anything wrong with trading upload credits for cash. Some users contribute their bandwidth, others their money and some both ( such as myself ), but one method of contribution isn't lesser than the other. Some sites such as XS don't count your downloads and don't care about your Ratio if you're a VIP, after all you've already done your part.

The article verges on an anti-capitalistic anti-profit mentality. There isn't anything _inherently_ wrong with profits ( in dollar terms, popularity, prestige - i.e. self-interested gain.) There's no exploitation involved, they provide a service, and we quite happily donate our time, money and bandwidth for it. There's absolutely nothing sinister about it, as TheEnd said, there's no secret.

P.S. I had a ratio of 10 when I donated. I donated because the tracker desperately needed a server upgrade, not because I needed upload credits to stave off a ban. :P

very informative. Thanks :)